Pliva, Inc. v. Huck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court “did not have jurisdiction” to extend an analogous appeals period for writ of review under 5 V.I.C. §§ 1421-1423 and 5 V.I.C. App. V, R. 11 during the pendency of a motion for reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).