Plimpton v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the “general rule of construction that no word or phrase shall be … treated as superfluous, redundant or meaningless, if to it a meaning can be given which is reasonable and consistent with the object and purpose of the writing considered as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).