Skip to main content
· 12/7/1966

Plemens v. Diddeglaser, Inc.

Citations

  • 224 A.2d 464
  • 244 Md. 556
  • 3 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1017
  • 1966 Md. LEXIS 464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the purpose of financing statement signature is to authenticate the document and that corporate debtor’s signature as individual did not destroy validity of the document

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, Horney, Marbury, Barnes, McWilliams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.