Connecticut Appellate Court· 3/16/1993
Pleines v. Franklin Construction Co.
Citations
- 30 Conn. App. 612
- 621 A.2d 759
- 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 130
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that damages in an unjust enrichment case properly can be measured by the reasonable value of services provided
- judgment as to breach of contract and upjust enrichment harmless because evidence sufficient to support judgment against defendant for identical damages under either theory
- although ‘‘proof of a contract ordinarily precludes the remedy of unjust enrichment,’’ judgment in favor of the plaintiff on both counts after court trial was harmless error because sufficient evidence was presented to support judgment under either theory
- although “proof of a contract ordinarily precludes the remedy of unjust enrichment,” judgment in favor of the plaintiff on both counts after court trial was harmless error because sufficient evidence was presented to support judgment under either theory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-11-08· cited 139×
- Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-08-18· cited 86×
- Auto Glass Express, Inc. v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-25· cited 37×
- Gardner v. PilatoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-26· cited 9×
- 300 State, LLC v. HanafinConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-01-22· cited 6×
- James P. Purcell Associates, Inc. v. HennesseyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-12-18· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1995-08-18
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-17· cited 694×
- McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-06-19· cited 116×
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-03-03· cited 97×
- John J. Brennan Construction Corporation, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-03· cited 94×
- Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-05-29· cited 93×
- Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-09-15· cited 82×
- Anderson v. ZweigbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-04-25· cited 34×
- Buddenhagen v. LuqueConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-02-24· cited 26×
- Shiang-Yueng Feng v. Dart Hill Realty, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-01-14· cited 13×
- Leigh v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-01-29· cited 10×
- Capital Consulting Group, Ltd. v. RochmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-23· cited 5×
- In re Lea T.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.