Pleasant v. Mathias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Appellants assume [Pleasant] was only an invitee because his service was being gratuitously performed. Such fact does not mean that he was not an employee, with respect to the duties owed him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).