PLEASANCE v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff's counsel's \repeated improper and prejudicial comments require[d] the granting of a new trial\
• counsel may not argue facts not in evidence
• counsel may not argue facts not in evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).