Platt v. Kenco Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notice was sufficiently detailed where it identified the content of the ordinance section being repealed or amended
• “[I]f no challenge is brought within 30 days of the date of the municipality’s second post-enactment Section 108 notice, the procedural validity of the ordinance is ‘reaffirmed.’ There is no deadline, however, where it would result in a deprivation of constitutional rights[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).