Platson v. NSM, America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that supervisor witnessed a man inappropriately touching a 16-year-old intern stated a negligent supervision claim
• holding that company intern who was allegedly assaulted by company employee stated a proper claim under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 317
• holding that company intern who was allegedly assaulted by company employee stated a proper claim under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 317
• employee’s assault on plaintiff was foreseeable where employer knew plaintiff was the “object” of “inappropriate physical advances”
• employee’s assault on plaintiff was foreseeable where employer knew plaintiff was the “object” of “inappropriate physical advances”
• “[P]laintiff has alleged sufficient facts to establish a possibility of recovery for negli‐ gent supervision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).