Skip to main content
· 12/3/2008

Platone v. United States Department of Labor

Citations

  • 548 F.3d 322
  • 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 778
  • 2009 CCH OSHD 32,980
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24378
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,396
  • 2008 WL 5077822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allegations were insufficient where they amount to “little more than alert- ing . . . management to an internal billing issue”
  • stating substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
  • upholding ALJ decision that “alerting [] management to an internal billing issue” is not enough to “make a proper allegation of fraud”
  • plaintiff did not “clearly articulate[] her belief of mail or wire fraud” to management, and the first time she did so “was in her OSHA complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Traxler, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.