Skip to main content
· 12/16/1980

Plastics & Equipment Sales Co. v. DeSoto, Inc.

Citations

  • 415 N.E.2d 492
  • 91 Ill. App. 3d 1011
  • 47 Ill. Dec. 487
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 4131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that recovery under quantum -9 9- meruit requires that AFLAC “knowingly accept” the service provided
  • services rendered not for a fee, but to secure a business advantage with another party
  • services rendered not for a fee, but to secure a business advantage with another party
  • quantum meruit inapplicable where • plaintiff claimed broker’s fee for services gratuitously conferred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.