Plassan v. Titus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff’s discrimination claim could survive a motion to dismiss when he “provide[d] considerable detail” in his complaint, “pointing to specific dates on which purportedly discriminatory interactions occurred and naming specific individuals involved”
• “The D.C. Circuit has held that a plaintiff is not required to allege that a Charter Sch. v. Lemus, 2022 WL 873549, at n.2 (D.D.C. Mar. 24, 2022) (quoting Campaign Legal Ctr. v. FEC, 520 F. Supp. 3d 38, 50 (D.D.C. 2021)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).