Plasman v. Decca Furn. (USA)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• framing the inquiry as “whether the [enhancement] conviction could stand if it rested upon the ‘least of the acts criminalized’” (citation omitted)
• noting that Stokeling does not reach conduct like snatching
• “Robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2111 is a ‘crime of violence’ under the elements clause of § 924(c)(3)(A).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).