Plaskon Electronic Materials, Inc. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that First, Fifth, Seventh and Tenth Circuits have all ruled that claims by one PRP against another must be brought pursuant to section 113(f)
• noting that liability under § 107(a) is joint and several, while liability under § 113(f) is merely several
• noting that the First, Fifth, Seventh and Tenth Circuits have all ruled that claims by one PRP against another must be brought pursuant to § 9613©
• noting that liability under § 107(a) is joint and several, while liability under § 113(f) is merely several
• recovery of demolition costs precluded where evidence showed plaintiff had demolished the buildings “in an effort to improve the aesthetics and marketability of the Site after the cessation of the manufacturing operations”
• PRP's Section 107 claim must be construed as a contribution action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).