Skip to main content
· 1/15/1839

Planters' & Merchants' Bank of Mobile v. Andrews

Citations

  • 8 Port. 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when “the evidence offered has legal significance independent of the truth of any statement contained in it, it is not hearsay.” (citations omitted)
  • “When interpreting disputed contractual provisions, the primary objective for the court is to determine the intent of the parties to the contract at the time they contracted.”
  • “When interpreting disputed contractual provisions, the primary objective for the court is to determine the intent of the parties to the contract at the time they contracted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collier, Goldthwaittí

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.