· 1/15/1839
Planters' & Merchants' Bank of Mobile v. Andrews
Citations
- 8 Port. 404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when “the evidence offered has legal significance independent of the truth of any statement contained in it, it is not hearsay.” (citations omitted)
- “When interpreting disputed contractual provisions, the primary objective for the court is to determine the intent of the parties to the contract at the time they contracted.”
- “When interpreting disputed contractual provisions, the primary objective for the court is to determine the intent of the parties to the contract at the time they contracted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collier, Goldthwaittí
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.