Skip to main content
· 9/29/1997

Plantation Shutter Co., Inc. v. Ezell

Citations

  • 492 S.E.2d 404
  • 328 S.C. 475
  • 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1105
  • 1997 S.C. App. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining the language of the contract as a whole to determine whether the UCC applied
  • noting issues are not preserved for appellate review when the master-in-equity never ruled on the issues and the appellant never made a motion to amend or alter the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e), SCRCP
  • noting issues are not preserved for appellate review when the lower court never ruled on the issues and the appellant never made a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e), SCRCP
  • contract for purchase, installation, and adjustment of interior window shutters was a sale of goods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Cureton, Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.