Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/11/1902
Plano Manufacturing Co. v. Kaufert
Citations
- 86 Minn. 13
- 89 N.W. 1124
- 1902 Minn. LEXIS 431
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the denial of defendant’s challenge to the validity of the summons, and thus the subject-matter jurisdiction of the district court, was a determination of the defendant’s “positive legal rights”
- an appeal from a district court’s denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss on grounds that the summons was void
- \[A]n order which denies the motion of a defendant ... to set aside the service of the summons ... determines his positive legal rights ... [;] such an order is appealable.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Start
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clegg v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1940-06-10· cited 36×
- Stimson v. StimsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1915-03-16· cited 34×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BarlowNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1910-04-15· cited 22×
- Flanery v. KushaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1919-07-18· cited 21×
- Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-12-16· cited 17×
- Bubar v. DizdarSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-07-17· cited 16×
- Francis v. KnerrSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-05-20· cited 15×
- Picciano v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1907-07-19· cited 13×
- United States v. Van DusenEighth Circuit· 1935-05-29· cited 12×
- Alfred v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-04-26· cited 11×
- Speyer v. Savogran Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-11-22· cited 11×
- Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-01-24· cited 10×
- Krafve v. RoySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1906-05-18· cited 9×
- McKenna v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-04-10· cited 8×
- Beuning Family LP v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-25· cited 7×
- Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-04-06· cited 5×
- Harrington v. Town of SalixSupreme Court of Iowa· 1957-10-15· cited 3×
- Cooney v. Milwaukee RailroadS.D. Iowa· 1964-01-30· cited 3×
- National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. GarberSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1916-04-28· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grimes v. BryneSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1858-12-15· cited 30×
- Strom v. Montana Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1900-11-14· cited 28×
- First National Bank v. EstensonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1897-04-23· cited 17×
- Ætna Insurance Co. v. GrubeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1861-12-15· cited 15×
- Pillsbury v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-06-25· cited 11×
- Rabitte v. NathanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1876-11-11· cited 5×
- Hillary v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-05-11· cited 5×
- Columbia Placer Co. v. Bucyrus Steam Shovel & Dredge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-01-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.