· 1/5/1966
Planning & Zoning Commission v. Synanon Foundation, Inc.
Citations
- 153 Conn. 305
- 216 A.2d 442
- 1966 Conn. LEXIS 525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family.”
- concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family”
- concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family”
- concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family”
- holding that “an ever-changing aggregate of individuals” did not constitute a “family”
- applying a zoning ordinance that did not define the term “family” and holding that “an ever-changing aggregate of individuals” did not constitute a “family”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Murphy, Alcorn, House, Cotter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.