Skip to main content
· 1/5/1966

Planning & Zoning Commission v. Synanon Foundation, Inc.

Citations

  • 153 Conn. 305
  • 216 A.2d 442
  • 1966 Conn. LEXIS 525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family.”
  • concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family”
  • concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family”
  • concluding that “ever-changing” group of individuals who slept, cooked, ate, worked, and carried on activities in a dwelling did not come within the meaning of the word “family”
  • holding that “an ever-changing aggregate of individuals” did not constitute a “family”
  • applying a zoning ordinance that did not define the term “family” and holding that “an ever-changing aggregate of individuals” did not constitute a “family”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Murphy, Alcorn, House, Cotter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.