Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona, Inc. v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Arizona law held unconstitutionally vague because physicians performing abortions were not given “fair warning under the statute as to what conduct is permitted and as to what conduct will expose them to criminal and civil liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).