Planned Parenthood Arizona Inc v. Tom Betlach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Planned Parenthood had stated a cause of action under § 1983 based on rights conferred by § 1396a(a)(23)
• concluding that Planned Parenthood had stated a cause of action under § 1983 based on rights conferred by § 1396a(a)(23)
• declaring that states are not free to define \qualified\ however they wish for their own purposes
• relying on the three-factor inquiry set out in Blessing, though never actually citing Wilder itself
• relying on the three-factor inquiry set out in Blessing, though never actually citing Wilder itself
• relying on the three-factor inquiry set out in Blessing, though never actually citing Wilder itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).