· 3/19/1996
Planet Insurance Co. v. Ertz
Citations
- 920 S.W.2d 591
- 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 450
- 1996 WL 117633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that there is primary insurance and excess insurance
- distinguishing and declining to apply State Farm in part because the insurance policies involved in Planet Insurance were excess policies and not primary policies like those in State Farm
- “‘Other insurance’ clauses are provisions inserted in insurance policies to vary or limit the insurer’s liability when additional, concurrent insurance exists to cover the same loss.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berrey, Ulrich, Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.