Planet Corporation v. George D. Sullivan, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 60(b)(1) motion filed 363 days after entry of judgment was not filed within a reasonable time
• holding, on particular facts, that a six-month delay in making a Rule 60(b)(6) motion was unreasonably dilatory
• noting that this rule “does not provide that grounds (1), (2), and (3) may be raised at leisure up to one year”
• observing that “[Rule] 60(b) does not provide that grounds (1), (2), and (3) may be raised at leisure up to one year”
• holding, on particular facts, that a six-month delay in making a Rule 60(b)(6) motion was unreasonably dilatory
• explaining that Rule 60(b)(4), Fed. R.Civ.P., which is for the most part identical to Alabama's Rule 60(b)(4), is generally considered to be inapplicable when the only ground for asserting that the judgment is void is the failure to give notice pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).