Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/14/2016
Planamento v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Citations
- 164 A.3d 460
- 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that witness credibility is a matter for the factfinder
- “[W]e draw every inference fairly deducible from the evidence in favor of the court’s decision.”
- “The 21 purpose of an adjudicatory hearing is to determine whether . . . the status of the subject child or children warrants intrusive protective or corrective state intervention into the familial relationship.”
- “In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain an adjudication, . . . we draw every inference fairly deducible from the evidence in favor of the court's decision.”
- “The credibility of the witnesses and the sufficiency, probative effect, and weight of the evidence, as well as the inferences and concl usions to be drawn therefrom, are within the discretion of the [fact finder ].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.