Plamp v. Mitchell School District No. 17-2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that similarly situated school functionaries lacked proper authority vis-avis teacher
• finding that while principal was an appropriate person, for purposes of Title IX, teacher and guidance counselor did not have sufficient remedial authority to be considered \appropriate persons\
• holding teachers were not “appropriate persons” when there was no evidence they “had control over” the harassing student or “were vested with special remedial authority regarding sexual-harassment claims generally”
• finding that “[s]uch a holding would run contrary to the purposes of [Title IX].”
• requiring deliberate indifference to or tacit authorization of unconstitutional misconduct for § 1983 failure-to-act claims and deliberate indifference to the rights of students for § 1983 failure-to-train claims
• finding adequate response when teacher was immediately suspended and not allowed on school property without a police escort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).