Skip to main content
· 3/19/1976

Plain v. Plain

Citations

  • 240 N.W.2d 330
  • 307 Minn. 399
  • 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We believe there can be no independent claim for loss of consortium by one spouse against the other, because no. actionable duty is breached”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Otis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.