Plack v. Baumer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal for failure to join an indispensable party is appropriate where the party “cannot be made a party”
• holding federal court had subject matter jurisdiction because plaintiff had alleged copyright infringement and sought injunc-tive remedy provided for by the Copyright Act
• finding that tribal sovereign immunity was not abrogated in the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.
• finding that tribal sovereign immunity was not abrogated in the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.
• noting that “[c]laims for breach of contract may be more susceptible to dismissal under Rule 19(b
• holding Indian tribe immune from suit under the Copyright Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).