Placet, Inc. v. Ashton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• promise to pay draw against commissions in future requires payment of amount of draw even if commission is unearned
• “The appellants claim that they may not be held liable for a breach of this agreement since they acted in ‘good faith’ in firing [the employee]. Once more, we cannot accept this contention.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Austin's Rack, Inc. v. Austin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-07· cited 5×
• Bank of Miami v. Armenteros
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-29· cited 3×
• Lester v. Kahn-McKnight Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-08· cited 2×
• Mootry v. Bethune-Cookman University, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-08· cited 1×
• Gambro Latin America, Inc. v. Fasano
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-05
• Northern Trust Bank of Florida, N.A. v. Rosefsky
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lyle v. Lyle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-09-02· cited 70×
• Paddock v. Bay Concrete Industries, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-08-30· cited 64×
• Royal American Rlty., Inc. v. Bank of Palm Beach & Tr. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-04· cited 56×
• Strawgate v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-30· cited 42×
• Popwell v. Abel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-09-19· cited 30×
• Havatampa Corp. v. Walton Drug Co., Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-01· cited 16×
• Hurwitz v. CGJ CORP.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-10-13· cited 15×
• Lyle v. Lyle
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-01-01· cited 12×
• Vera-Nunez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-27· cited 1×