P.K. Vichare v. Ambac Inc. And Ambac Indemnity Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of a motion to bifurcate trial where the issues were “intertwined” and “[s]everal of the same witnesses would have to be called”
• affirming the denial of a motion to bifurcate trial where the issues were “intertwined” and “[s]everal of the same witnesses would have to be called”
• bifurcation appropriate where litigation on one issue may obviate need to try second issue
• “[t]he interests served by bifurcated trials are convenience, negation of prejudice, and judicial efficiency”
• “The interests served by bifurcated trials are convenience, negation of prejudice, and judicial efficiency.”
• “Traditionally, in order to constitute an impermissible compromise the verdict must, at least, be inconsistent with the facts adduced at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).