P.K. P. v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that acts of mail and wire fraud taking place over two years and involving different defendants were not part of a common scheme
• stating that \courts should ordinarily satisfy jurisdictional concerns before addressing the merits of a civil action\
• explaining that Rule 9(b) requires the pleader to specify the time, place, and content of the alleged false or fraudulent representations
• explaining that RICO was intended to apply “only to enduring criminal conduct”
• upholding a district court certification which lacked specific findings, but where the judgment had disposed of all claims against all six appellees
• noting that where “the affected defendant does not insist that the jurisdictional issue be determined first, . . . we cannot fault the district court for eschewing difficult jurisdictional and venue-related issues in favor of ordering dismissal on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).