P.J.'s Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Nextel West Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[i]n the interests of judicial economy and reaching an equitable result, however, a reviewing court may go beyond the certified question and consider the appropriateness of the order giving rise to the appeal”
• affirming class certification where class was predicated on an essentially identical entry appearing on class members’ bills
• finding defendant improperly relied on Rule 23 order and refusing to consider it
• finding defendant improperly relied on Rule 23 order and refusing to consider it
• certifying class’s ICFA claim and holding that predominance requirement was met where the “primary factual issue in this ease is a uniform billing practice that allegedly violated the Consumer Fraud Act in the same manner as to all class members”
• “Class certification issues are typically factual and should be decided with the benefit of discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).