Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant's constitutional attack on statute predicated on hypothetical facts deemed irrelevant and therefore court declined to address
• defendant’s constitutional attack on statute predicated on hypothetical facts deemed irrelevant and therefore court declined to address
• due process is served when interested parties are provided with a fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, inspect documents and offer evidence in rebuttal
• because legislature is presumed to know all statutes and effects that its actions will have, later enacted provision governs as legislature’s most recent articulation of its intent
• information supplied by party to controversy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).