Pizzarotti, LLC v. CabGram Dev., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that states where gambling was illegal could not prohibit broadcasts advertising casinos from states where gambling was legal
• holding that a newspaper publisher who had been convicted of violating a state statute outlawing advertising regarding abortion services had standing to challenge the law on First Amendment grounds
• holding that Virginia’s “interest in shielding its citizens from information about activities outside Virginia’s borders, activities that Virginia’s police powers do not reach ... was entitled to little, if any, weight”
• holding that the First Amendment precluded the imposition of criminal 13 liability against a newspaper editor for publishing an advertisement for abortion, which 14 was legal in Virginia at the time
• stating that an 47 as applied challenge considers the “application” of a statute “to the particular circumstances of an individual” (citation omitted)
• finding that newspaper advertising of an abortion clinic’s referral services was speech

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).