Pizza Hut v. Proctor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the E/C could not rely upon section 440.09(l)(b) because the case involved two industrial accidents and injuries without any preexisting injury attributable to a nonindustrial cause
• holding that the E/C could not rely upon section 440.09(1)(b) because the case involved two industrial accidents and injuries without any preexisting injury attributable to a nonindustrial cause
• “[Section 440.09(l)(b) applies when a claimant’s need for treatment or benefits is caused by the impact of an industrial accident combining with a preexisting' injury or condition which is unrelated to an industrial accident.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).