Skip to main content
· 1/27/2006

Pixton v. Williams Scotsman, Inc.

Citations

  • 924 So. 2d 37
  • 2006 WL 191882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n evidentiary hearing is mandated to determine the clients’ involvement or complicity in the attorney’s conduct.”
  • “If this was a case in which only [the litigants], and not their counsel, had engaged in wrongdoing or noncompliance with the rules, Kozel would not apply.”
  • “[a] trial court’s failure to consider the Kozel factors in determining whether dismissal is appropriate is, by itself, a basis for remand for application of the correct standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Semento

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.