Pixton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Pixton is a third-party claimant because she has no relevant contractual relationship with State Farm and her claims “are grounded in her status as an injured claimant attempting to recover against State Farm as the insurer of the tortfeasor”
• “we are persuaded that there is no duty of good faith and fair dealing imposed upon an insurer running to a third-party claimant”
• there is no duty of good faith and fair dealing imposed upon an insurer running to a third party claimant, such as Pixton, seeking to recover against the company's insured
• listing the elements of negligent misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).