Skip to main content
· 3/8/1940

Pitzer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 31 N.E.2d 450
  • 66 Ohio App. 35
  • 19 Ohio Op. 292
  • 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the \intent and meaning\ of the original version of former article 4.10 and the context of the insurance industry at the time the statute was enacted to determine that out-of-state insurance companies were subject to the gross receipts tax
  • considering the \intent and meaning\ of the original version of former article 4.10 and the context of the insurance industry at the time the statute was enacted to determine that out-of-state insurance companies were subject to the gross receipts tax
  • considering the “intent and meaning” of the original version of former article 4.10 and the context of the insurance industry at the time the statute was enacted to determine that out-of-state insurance companies were subject to the gross receipts tax

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nichols, Carter, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.