· 6/28/2017
Pittsley v. Nooth
Citations
- 286 Or. App. 516
- 396 P.3d 952
- 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 830
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for Board to provide adequate reasons or bases regarding determination that appellant had not submitted new and material evidence
- “ ‘[o]nce there is a final decision on a particular claim of CUE, that particular claim of CUE may not be raised again; it is res judicata’” (quoting Olson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 430, 433 (1993))
- “ ‘[o]nce there is a final decision on a particular claim of CUE, that particular claim of CUE may not be raised again; it is res judicata’ ” (quoting Olson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 430, 433 (1993))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Shorr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.