Skip to main content
· 6/28/2017

Pittsley v. Nooth

Citations

  • 286 Or. App. 516
  • 396 P.3d 952
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for Board to provide adequate reasons or bases regarding determination that appellant had not submitted new and material evidence
  • “ ‘[o]nce there is a final decision on a particular claim of CUE, that particular claim of CUE may not be raised again; it is res judicata’” (quoting Olson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 430, 433 (1993))
  • “ ‘[o]nce there is a final decision on a particular claim of CUE, that particular claim of CUE may not be raised again; it is res judicata’ ” (quoting Olson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 430, 433 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Shorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.