Pittsburg's Petition
Citations
- 32 Pa. Super. 210
- 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 324
Syllabus
<p>Constitutional law — Legislature—Extra session — Proclamation of governor — Act of February 7, 1906, P. L. 7 — Municipalities.</p> <p>Where the governor has issued a proclamation convening the general assembly in extraordinary session to meet on a day stated to consider legislation upon certain subjects designated, he may subsequently before the date of the meeting issue another proclamation setting forth additional subjects for the consideration of the general assembly at its extraordinary session.</p> <p>The Act of February 7,1906, P. L. 7, entitled, “An Act to enable cities that are now, or may hereafter be, contiguous or in close proximity, to be united, with any intervening land, other than boroughs, in one municipality; providing for the consequences of such consolidation, the temporary government of the consolidated city, payment of the indebtedness of each of the united territories, and the enforcement of debts and claims due to or from each,” is within the scope of one of the reasons stated by the governor for calling an extra session of the legislature in 1906, viz: “to enable cities that are now, or may hereafter be contiguous, or in close proximity, including any intervening land to being united in one municipality in order that the people may avoid the unnecessary burdens of maintaining separate municipal governments.”</p> <p>Constitutional law — Local legislation — Municipalities—Union of municipalities — Act of February 7, 1906, P. -L. 7.</p> <p>The Act of February 7,1906, P. L. 7, entitled “ An Act to enable cities that are now, or may hereafter be, contiguous or in close proximity, to be united, with any intervening land other than boroughs, in one municipality; providing for the consequences of such consolidation, the temporary government of the consolidated city, payment of indebtedness of each of the united territories, and the enforcement of debts and claims due to or from each,” does not violate section 7, article III of the constitution for
Judges: Beater, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Oblady, Orlady, Porter, Rige
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pittsburg's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-03-11· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. PapsoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-10-10· cited 9×
- Likins's PetitionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-12-21· cited 5×
- Earl v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-03-03
- Commonwealth v. BriggsPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1938-12-02
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ayars v. WestfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-01-07· cited 84×
- Seabolt v. Commissioners of Northumberland CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-07-21· cited 76×
- Lloyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-15· cited 57×
- Ervine's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1851-06-12· cited 25×
- Perkins v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1893-07-19· cited 22×
- Weinman v. Wilkinsburg & E. L. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-01-03· cited 21×
- Speer v. School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1865-06-19· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. ZephonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1845-03-15· cited 18×
- Sample v. PittsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-06-22· cited 17×
- Blankenburg v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-10-21· cited 13×
- Gas & Water Co. v. Corporation of Borough of DowningtownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-05-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.