Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying petitioner's claims of prejudicial error because it \would not have changed the result\
• denying petitioner's claims of prejudicial error because it \would not have changed the result\
• denying petitioner’s claims of prejudicial error because it “would not have changed the result”
• denying petitioner’s claims of prejudicial error because it “would not have changed the result”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).