Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company v. Kee Ike Yazzie, Roselyn D. John, Romero Brown, Lewis Calamity, Peter J. Korth, and David C. Brunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining congressional -belief “that all reservations would be temporary is irrelevant in determining whether the boundaries of a specific reservation were being diminished by the language of a given statute”
• explaining congressional belief “that all reservations would be temporary is irrelevant in determining whether the boundaries of a specific reservation were being diminished by the language of a given statute”
• explaining congressional belief “that all reservations would be temporary is irrelevant in determining whether the boundaries of a specific reservation were being diminished by the language of a given statute”
• observing “the distinction between title and boundary [is] an important one”
• observing “the distinction between title and boundary [is] an important one”
• observing “the distinction between title and boundary [is] an important one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).