Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Darlington's Admx.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Unfortunately, courts also agree that CERCLA, a hastily enacted legislative compromise, is poorly drafted, ambiguous, and difficult to interpret.” (citing Amoco Oil Co. v. Borden, Inc., 889 F.2d 664, 667 (5th Cir. 1989)
• “[T]he only causation required under CERCLA is that the release of hazardous substances at the ‘facility’ cause the response costs; a plaintiff does not need to prove that the defendant’s waste caused the response costs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).