Skip to main content

Pitts v. State

Citations

  • 428 S.E.2d 650
  • 207 Ga. App. 606
  • 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1008
  • 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule applicable in criminal cases also should be applied in forfeiture proceedings because of their quasi-criminal nature
  • Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule applicable in criminal cases also should be applied in forfeiture proceedings because of their quasi-criminal nature
  • State need only prove that the property as to which forfeiture is sought falls within one of the statutory categories in order to prevail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Pope, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.