Pitts v. Sipes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an entity may be liable for nuisance/trespass if it is “the cause or a concurrent cause of the creation, continuance, or maintenance of the nuisance” (quoting Sumitomo Corp. of Am. v. Deal, 569 S.E.2d 608, 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002))
• “the plaintiff is entitled to only one recovery and satisfaction of damages, because such recovery and satisfaction is deemed to make the plaintiff whole”
• “the plaintiff is entitled to only one recovery and satisfaction of damages, because such recovery and satisfaction is deemed to make the plaintiff whole”
• “It is a well-settled appellate rule that one cannot complain about a ruling of the trial court which the party’s own trial tactics or conduct procured or aided in causing.”
• “It is a well-settled appellate rule that one cannot complain about a ruling of the trial court which the party’s own trial tactics or conduct procured or aided in causing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).