Skip to main content

Pittman v. State

Citations

  • 344 S.E.2d 511
  • 178 Ga. App. 693
  • 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1712

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting into evidence diagram on which child, at trial, indicated which body parts were involved in act of molestation
  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting into evidence diagram on which child, at trial, indicated which body parts were involved in act of molestation
  • cross-examination properly limited on state’s objection where defendant made no offer of proof or other showing that the testimony to be elicited was material
  • “In child molestation cases evidence of other similar or connected sexual offenses against children is admissible to corroborate the testimony of the victim as well as to show the lustful disposition of the defendant”
  • “In child molestation cases evidence of other similar or connected sexual offenses against children is admissible to corroborate the testimony of the victim as well as to show the lustful disposition of the defendant.”
  • “The trial court has wide discretion in determining relevancy and materiality, and furthermore, where the relevancy or competency is doubtful, the evidence should be admitted, and its weight left to the determination of the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Deen, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.