Skip to main content
· 11/20/1995

Pitter v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of America

Citations

  • 906 F. Supp. 130
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17531
  • 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,852
  • 1995 WL 694631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it entirely appropriate to compel plaintiff's compliance with non-substantive rules that took effect almost six months before lawsuit was filed
  • directing arbitration of Title VII claim on the grounds that \it is entirely appropriate to hold Pitter to compliance with non-substantive rules that took effect almost six months before he filed his lawsuit\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raggi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.