Pitten v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing CRA claims brought on behalf of non-California 20 plaintiffs because the CRA “is clear that it applies only ‘to ensure the personal information [of] 21 California residents is protected’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).