Skip to main content
· 11/1/1988

Pitstick v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Sales Ltd.

Citations

  • 698 F. Supp. 131
  • 10 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1373
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12161
  • 1988 WL 115780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an Ohio resident bringing a denial of severance benefits claim under ERISA based on a plan maintained in Canada primarily for the benefit of Canadian employees could not bring his claim under ERISA, as the plan squarely fell within the foreign plan exemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.