Skip to main content
· 6/6/1996

Pitre v. Internal Revenue Service

Citations

  • 938 F. Supp. 95
  • 78 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5328
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that the court should use the postmark date for untimely return, which was also treated as refund claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiCLERICO

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.