Skip to main content
· 5/17/1983

Pitney Bowes, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Celina Mestre, Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Mestre, Deceased, Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 701 F.2d 1365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final decision”
  • holding that Brulotte was applicable to hybrid agreements concerning patent and trade secret rights
  • whether alleged patent misuse was a type of antitrust violation; jurisdiction of the district court not an issue raised
  • “A final decision is one which ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.”
  • “[T]he notice specifically stated that the appeal was only ‘from those portions’ of the order that dealt with issues raised in the summary judgment motions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dyer, Johnson, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.