· 5/17/1983
Pitney Bowes, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Celina Mestre, Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Mestre, Deceased, Cross-Appellant
Citations
- 701 F.2d 1365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final decision”
- holding that Brulotte was applicable to hybrid agreements concerning patent and trade secret rights
- whether alleged patent misuse was a type of antitrust violation; jurisdiction of the district court not an issue raised
- “A final decision is one which ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.”
- “[T]he notice specifically stated that the appeal was only ‘from those portions’ of the order that dealt with issues raised in the summary judgment motions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dyer, Johnson, Roney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.