Pitman v. City of Oakland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while section 432.7 permits employers to inquire about an arrest, it still does not permit usage of that information for disciplinary purposes
• “Terminating an employee is not alone sufficient to satisfy the standard for extreme and outrageous conduct.”
• stating the plaintiff’s “allegations that she was improperly terminated [for 12 discriminatory and retaliatory reasons] simply do not make out a claim of intentional infliction of 13 emotional distress”
• termination from employment does not, by itself, constitute extreme and outrageous conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).