Pitka v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both holding that even when a trial judge completely fails to conduct any LaVigpe advisement, the defendant must still establish prejudice by affirmatively showing (1) that they would have taken the stand if they had known that it was their right, and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jordan v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2018-05-04· cited 17×
• Wyatt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-02-17· cited 3×
• Hutton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2013-07-26· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sullivan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
• United States v. Gaudin
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 2,553×
• Thomas Martinez v. Robert Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-07-18· cited 67×
• LaVigne v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-05-31· cited 62×
• United States v. Patricia S. Caldwell
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-03-18· cited 57×
• Reynolds v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-06-10· cited 49×
• United States v. Tagalicud
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-05-29· cited 29×
• Sears v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-02-14· cited 24×
• Hurn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1994-04-08· cited 22×
• Russell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-03-28· cited 17×
• Echols v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-10-04· cited 16×